Music Piracy in 2025: Why Streaming Growth Hasn’t Solved the Problem
You may be shocked to learn that in 2025, music piracy is well and truly making a comeback. And, I guess you are probably thinking, Really? But we’ve got Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Premium, and about fifteen other ways to easily stream pretty much any song ever recorded for the price of a fancy coffee each month. So why are we talking about this, again?
MUSO’s piracy report dropped some shocking numbers this year. They reported 216.3 billion people, that’s billion with a B, visited websites offering illegal content. However, these massive numbers only show us part of what’s really happening out there. Obscured from these statistics are tons of new methods people use to get illegal content. Apps pop up constantly. Secret platforms multiply faster than anyone can count them, and they’re specifically built to hide from the companies trying to track this stuff. Britain paints a much clearer picture of what’s really going on.
In the United Kingdom, music piracy jumped to 26% of all consumers in 2024, up from 25% back in 2022. This increase may seem small, but it’s also quite odd when you think about how many legal streaming services exist now. American people are spending about $69 every month on entertainment streaming services, And, that’s 13% more money than they spent last year on the same services, before choosing where to legally get ones music.
This reflects the growing perception of consumer frustration with legal streaming costs and the complexity of use of the platforms. Now, more than 40 per cent of music piracy worldwide involves copying songs directly from these streaming services. The technology designed to fight piracy is actually making it worse. And, this rise isn’t about old habits or challenging the industry. It’s about money, platform issues, and new tech. The music industry made things convenient, then made them more expensive and complicated to use.
For the first time in a long time, this has made illegal downloads seem a more attractive solution than ever before.
The Economic Perfect Storm
Subscription Fatigue Reaches Breaking Point
Deloitte’s 2025 survey reported that 41% of people think streaming content isn’t worth what they’re paying for it anymore. Taking the bills we all have to pay out every month out of the equation (if you can?), your average household is now juggling five different streaming video subscriptions to watch the shows that we all want to watch. Five! Then someone suggests adding Spotify or similar on top of that, and suddenly you’re looking at another £11.99 to £20.00 per month on average.
And then, there’s a psychological effect happening as well. Music streaming has now become this quasi “add-on expense” in people’s minds. Like, you’ve already blown £60-80 on video content, so when the music bill shows up, it starts feeling far less essential. Especially when your friend can just send you that new album through WhatsApp, or you can grab it off YouTube in about thirty seconds. People are basically doing mental maths, accounting and reasoning, “I’m already paying for entertainment, why do I need to pay again for music?”
Music Platform Pricing Chaos
If you remember Spotify’s audiobook disaster back in 2023, they took their £9.99 subscription, increased it to £10.99 and decided to bundle it with audiobooks that maybe 20% of existing users actually wanted. Then, they created this Premium Individual plan at £11.99 if you wanted the audiobooks included properly. The whole thing was as confusing as I’m explaining it. And, frankly, people were annoyed about having to pay for more features they didn’t ask for.
YouTube Music has done a similar thing in some markets. Norway has seen a 42% price increase, and the Czech Republic was hit with a 44% jump. We’re talking about going from reasonable monthly costs to “wait, what did you say?” territory overnight. They justified it (as they always do) by “improving the service,” but when your music bill suddenly costs more than your phone plan, people tend to start looking for alternatives. And so, the upshot of all this is that the messaging here is encrypted. Some platforms are jacking up prices while others are slashing them to compete.
Users don’t know what to expect month to month, and frankly, they don’t care. They want what they want at the price they want it.
The Macro-Economic Context
The UK survey data tells the real story here. People are straight-up saying they’re pirating music because of the “cost-of-living pressures.” It’s not about being cheap or wanting to stick it to record labels. It’s a reality of choosing between paying for Spotify and buying food groceries. When inflation is hitting everything from rent to gas/electric/water to food, discretionary spending gets squeezed hard. Music subscriptions fall into that category of “nice to have but not essential,” especially when free alternatives, that can now feel as good as the premium alternatives, exist. The psychological impact of watching multiple subscription charges hit your bank account every month creates this sense of being what the Americans refer to as ‘nickel-and-dimed’ to death.
“Subscription creep” is a very real, sneaky phenomenon that many don’t notice. You’ve probably started with Netflix at £12.99, added in Amazon Prime for that shipping you ‘need’, throw in Disney+ for the kids, grab HBO for that one show everyone’s talking about, and, before you know it, you’re paying more for your streaming than you used to pay for cable way back when. Adding music on top? It can feel like the last straw.
The reality of this is that the timing couldn’t be worse for the music industry. Right when they need people to see streaming as absolutely essential, economic pressures are making it feel optional again.
Platform Limitations That Push Users to Piracy
The UMG-TikTok Case Study: When Discovery Breaks
In February 2024, Universal Music Group and TikTok had their well publicised licensing breakdown. As you may have experienced, suddenly, there were millions of muted videos all over the place. Harvard Business School actually studied this mess and found some interesting results. When tracks got pulled from TikTok, Spotify and YouTube, listening rates for those specific songs increased by 2-3%.
The creator community response was, let’s say, ‘creative’. Video creators started using royalty-free knockoffs, unofficial covers, and plenty of ripped audio that technically violated copyright, but wouldn’t get flagged. And that’s the scary part for the music industry. Creators got comfortable using unofficial sources during the dispute , and some never went back to using official tracks even after the licensing got sorted out in May. Once you normalise grabbing audio from less-than-reputable sources, easily, it can become a habit. The ‘issue’ has been solved in tech-savvy Gen Z’s minds, and the long-term damage is still playing out. People learned that the legal music ecosystem can just… stop working. Without warning.
Quality Wars and Audiophile Frustration
Spotify finally launched its lossless audio in 2025, maxing it at 24-bit/44.1kHz. While, Apple Music and others, are pushing 24-bit/192kHz. Tidal dropped its MQA format in July 2024 and switched everything to standard lossless FLAC. YouTube Music/Premium still doesn’t have lossless audio at all. In 2025, you’ve got people paying £12.99 a month and getting compressed audio that could sound worse than a decent YouTube rip.
The inconsistency of quality across different platforms is driving people who care about such things to distraction. You can pay premium prices, but can’t get premium quality. So music lovers end up maintaining these ‘hybrid setups’. Maybe Tidal for critical listening, Spotify for discovery, and a folder full of downloads for the stuff that’s not available in good quality anywhere legally.
The Fragmentation Problem
Remember when music was just available… everywhere? Well, those days are over. Now we have got exclusive albums dropping on one platform , limited releases on another, and don’t even get me started on the geographical licensing maze. Geo-blocking is also still a massive pain in 2025. You can be scrolling through Spotify in the UK, find a playlist with an American artist, click play and… “This content is not available in your region.” So you access it through a VPN, or, which is probably more convenient, you just search for it on a piracy site that has absolutely zero interest in regional licensing.
I’m embellishing a little to make the point, as exclusive content wars aren’t as bad as they were a few years ago, but they’re still happening. When Taylor Swift or Drake drops something exclusively on one platform as a ‘release strategy’, fans on other platforms don’t just wait patiently. They grab it from wherever they can find it, which usually isn’t an official source.
Library churn is the worst part, though. You spend months building the perfect playlist, only to have half the songs disappear because of a licensing dispute. It happened with Spotify and Neil Young, it happened during the UMG-TikTok thing, and it’ll keep happening. People are getting tired of their music vanishing, and so, start keeping local copies as backup. The psychology here is pretty straightforward: if platforms can’t guarantee your music will be there tomorrow, why not just download it today? It’s almost a subconscious reaction as a solution to an issue that users did not create.
Technology: The New Generation of Piracy Tools
Stream-Ripping Dominance
Remember burning CDs? No, me neither, 
Or waiting three hours for one song to download on a peer-to-peer network like Limewire? I absolutely do not remember that. Anyway, those days are absolutely dead. Stream ripping now dominates music piracy traffic, and it’s not hard to see why. The whole process is so simple now. You can find a song online, copy the URL, paste it into something like SaveFrom or Y2Mate, click download, and bang. You’ve got an MP3 file (of illegal music) in about thirty seconds. No torrenting, no seeding, no complex software installations.
This “one-click mentality” has totally circumvented the old BitTorrent culture that made users download special programs, learn complicated sharing rules, and wait hours for songs to finish downloading. Learning how to do this became ridiculously easy. Plus, people don’t think of it as “real” piracy (or crime) anymore. It feels like you’re just… saving something from the internet.
Mobile First Piracy Ecosystems
In 2025, piracy has gone mobile in a big way. There are entire app ecosystems now that look and feel like legitimate music players but are actually pulling content from questionable sources. They’ve got sleek interfaces, playlist features, offline downloads, pretty much everything you’d expect from, say, Apple Music. Except, they’re not paying anyone for the music at all. Some of these apps have millions of downloads on unofficial app stores.
Messaging platform integration is also huge. WhatsApp groups sharing albums, Telegram channels with massive music libraries and Discord servers trading rare tracks. It’s social piracy, and your friends are the distributors. Everything feels casual and friendly, and informative rather than criminal. The cross-device sync expectations are also incredibly advanced these days. Some of these unofficial tools are delivering better sync experiences than the official platforms. There are apps that’ll automatically organise your downloaded music, create smart playlists, and even suggest new tracks based on what you already have.
It’s like the piracy ecosystem has evolved to match user expectations that were set by legitimate services that, ironically, almost eliminated piracy. The scary part for the music industry is how invisible this stuff is to traditional tracking methods. When someone downloads an album through a messaging app or a mobile-first service, it doesn’t show up in any official web traffic statistics. So, the 18.6% decline in web-based piracy visits? Yeah, that might just be people switching to better, more efficient/evasive tools.
AI Music: The Wild Card
So this is where things can get properly sketchy. In 2024 the biggest sites for AI-generated music, Suno and Udio, got sued by the major labels for allegedly training their AI models on copyrighted music. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of songs allegedly “scraped” and used as training data. The RIAA called it a “straightforward case of unlicensed copying.” But there’s a major difference from traditional piracy*: AI isn’t just copying music, it’s creating new music* that sounds eerily similar to existing human artists. The legal implications are also mind-bending.
If an AI creates a song that sounds 80% like a Drake track but ‘technically’ isn’t stealing any specific melody or lyrics, is that copyright infringement? The courts are still figuring it all out, but in the meantime, these tools are getting better with every iteration.
The lawsuits are numerous and are ongoing, but even if the major companies get shut down, the technology is out there forever now. Open-source music generation models are popping up all over GitHub. Once new technology you really can’t really un-invent this stuff and it will be utilised in some way moving forward. And let’s not forget, the quality of the tracks these platforms are creating is improving faster than anyone expected. Six months ago, AI music sounded obviously artificial. Now? Some of it is good enough that you wouldn’t notice unless you were really paying attention. I n fact, Tidal RECENTLY REPORTED….. That’s pretty terrifying for an industry that’s built on selling access to specific, copyrighted recordings.
The Behavioural Shift: From Streaming-First to Hybrid Models
Discovery vs. Consumption Decoupling
Something weird is happening with how people find and listen to music in 2025. Social platforms have become the primary discovery engine , but they’re not where people actually consume the music long-term. It’s pretty much like window shopping versus actually buying stuff. You probably discover new tracks on TikTok, Instagram Reels, or YouTube Shorts. But when you want to actually listen to the full song, that’s where things get complicated. Maybe it’s on your streaming platform, maybe it’s not. Maybe it’s geo-blocked, maybe the audio quality sucks, maybe it’ll disappear next month due to licensing drama. In fact, who knows?
So people are developing this “hedge” behaviour where they maintain legal streaming subscriptions for convenience and discovery, but also keep backup copies of songs they really care about. It’s like digital insurance. You pay for Spotify because it’s easy access and has good recommendations, but you also download the stuff you can’t afford to lose. The creator community has completely normalised workarounds as well during platform disputes and licensing breakdowns. Content creators learned very quickly to keep multiple audio sources at the ready. The official track, a royalty-free version, or, maybe a “backup” file that’s technically questionable but won’t trigger content filters. This mindset is spreading to regular users, too. Feed that instilled convenience with insurance.
At the heart of it, it’s not really about being anti-establishment or wanting to hurt artists. It’s about price, reliability and convenience.
Ownership Psychology Returns
A UK-based survey has revealed that its downloading that dominates music piracy, not streaming illegal content. That’s really significant because it shows people want to own files, not just access them temporarily. There’s this whole “control” and “permanence” psychology coming back into the mix. People who grew up with iTunes and MP3 collections remember what it felt like to actually own their music library. You could organise it however you wanted, play it offline, transfer it between devices, and never worry about it vanishing due to some corporate drama.
Generational differences are also playing a part. Gen X and older millennials often talk about missing the “ownership” feeling of Vinyl, CDs and digital downloads. But even Gen Z, who supposedly don’t care about owning anything, are starting to download music files when they really love something. It’s partly practical and partly emotional. Practically, downloaded files work everywhere, as they don’t need internet, and can’t be taken away by licensing disputes.
The streaming model trained people to think of music as a service rather than a product. But platform reliability issues are pushing people back toward an ownership mentality. When your Spotify playlist gets gutted because of label disputes, having local files starts looking pretty smart, because you are taking charge of that and are not subservient to a higher authority saying ‘no’ when you are already paying £70 a month.
The Creator Economy Spillover Effect
Muted video experiences have changed how creators and viewers perceive audio. If you spend months getting permission to use certain songs, following every rule the music companies want, only to wake up and find your video completely gone because some computer program decided it broke rules. You’ll start finding alternative solutions.
Artists are now skipping the big music platforms and talking directly to their fans instead. They are sharing music directly through Discord, email, or even just through socials. Fans follow their favourite musicians on every single app, so when something new comes out, they download it right away because they’ve learned that today’s music might be gone tomorrow, thanks to legal fights, rule changes, or when companies merge and delete stuff without asking anyone.
All of these factors have created a kind of parallel music ecosystem where official platforms are just one choice amongst many. People are possibly more willing to grab music from unofficial sources because they have watched the official sources fail them repeatedly. I suppose you could say that the music business accidentally trained its own customers to look elsewhere for music.
Industry/Consumer Relations/Tensions
There’s another layer that’s making piracy feel more morally acceptable to fans in 2025. Daniel Ek’s massive stock sales are creating a PR nightmare that has directly influenced how people think about supporting Spotify versus supporting artists. Spotify executives have cashed out over $1.1 billion in company stock in 2024 , with CEO Daniel Ek alone selling $283-345 million worth of shares. To put that into perspective, an artist would need 314 billion streams to earn what Ek made from stock sales in one year. When Spotify pays artists roughly $0.003 or £0.006 per stream, fans (and artists) are doing the maths and getting pretty angry.
Major acts like King Gizzard & The Lizard Wizard, Xiu Xiu, and Deerhoof have pulled their music from Spotify in 2025, encouraging boycotts. They are citing both low payouts and Ek’s controversial €600 million investment in Helsing, an AI weapons company. When respected artists are publicly calling Spotify a “violent armageddon portal,” it psychologically impacts on fans’ behaviour. This has created a moral justification feedback loop for piracy. Fans tell themselves they’re not hurting artists by downloading music illegally. They’re just refusing to enrich a CEO who’s already made hundreds of millions whilst paying artists pennies.
Industry Response: Legal and Technical Countermeasures
Dynamic Blocking Revolution
Italy could be seen to be leading the way in anti-piracy with its “Piracy Shield” system. This isn’t your typical website blocking approach; the system fires off what they call “dynamic injunctions”, essentially, court orders that adapt and change automatically without needing a judge’s approval. These injunctions don’t just slam the door on one specific website; they attack entire networks. Even mirror sites that copy the original illegal website get shut down before most people even know they exist. Proxy services that help users sneak around blocks get identified pretty quickly as well and stopped almost immediately.
The speed here is what makes this system different from everything that came before it. We’re talking about blocking that happens faster than the people running illegal sites can reasonably switch to new domain names, find new servers, or set up alternative ways for users to access their content.
France’s ARCOM has also been quietly doing their thing with their multi-year blocking campaigns. Their data has shown significant drops in piracy site traffic and actual increases in legal service subscriptions after the blocks go into effect. They’re also reporting 8-12% bump in legal streaming when major piracy sites get taken down. Which is pretty solid proof that this kind of blocking actually works. What’s impressive and scary is how comprehensive these systems are getting. It’s not just about blocking websites anymore, they’re targeting the entire ecosystem. CDNs, hosting providers, payment processors, and advertising networks. All. Blocked.
The goal is to make running a piracy site so technically difficult and financially unsustainable that people are just going to give up.
Criminal Enforcement Escalation
Brazil decided to stop playing around in 2025 and went after the Yout stream-ripper operator with criminal charges. This shift from civil to criminal frameworks is happening globally, and it’s changing the risk calculation for piracy operators. Getting sued is pretty inconvenient, but going to jail is a whole different level of consequence. Some countries are treating large-scale stream-ripping operations as organised crime rather than simple copyright infringement.
The psychological impact might actually turn out to be more important than the prosecutions, though. We are talking global perspective. When operators see someone facing years in prison instead of just financial penalties, I’m pretty certain some of them will decide the risk isn’t worth it anymore. Even if only a few cases result in actual jail time, the threat changes the entire landscape. What’s also interesting is how enforcement agencies are sharing intelligence and techniques now. A successful blocking strategy in Italy is adopted/adapted by France, and Brazil’s criminal prosecution methods are studied by other countries. It’s like they’re building a global playbook against unauthorised piracy.
Platform Innovation Responses
DSP enhanced detection and takedown systems are also getting surprisingly sophisticated. DSP’s are starting to use audio fingerprinting that can identify copyrighted tracks even when they’re pitch-shifted, sped up, or mixed with other audio. The cat-and-mouse game between uploader/distributor/DSP is constantly shifting and escalating. Some platforms are experimenting with preemptive blocking. The identification and removal of content before it even gets uploaded, based on audio analysis and user behaviour patterns. The speed of response is also becoming crucial. Stream-ripping sites naturally depend on having new, popular content available quickly. If platforms can identify and block ripped content within hours instead of days, it breaks the immediate gratification that makes stream-ripping an attractive prospect.
Collaborative industry efforts are ramping up, too. Instead of each platform fighting piracy separately, there’s far more coordination on sharing detection methods, blocklists, and enforcement strategies. The industry is basically acting reactively by trying to make piracy more inconvenient than just paying for legal access. If they can make illegal file-sharing sources slower, less reliable, and riskier than the well-established official platforms, most casual pirates will probably just give up and subscribe to something legitimate.
The 2025 Landscape: What the Data Really Shows
Web Traffic vs. Reality
So, I’ve identified that there is something most are getting wrong about that 18.6% decline in music piracy web visits. The music industry saw those MUSO numbers and probably thought they were winning the war. But the reality is channel migration/adoption is happening big time. People aren’t abandoning piracy; Gen Z and Millennials are very tech savvy, and they are simply just using better, more sophisticated tools.
The methodologies being used to measure this are fundamentally outdated for how piracy actually works in 2025. Plus, the smarter pirates have learned to fly under the radar. Instead of visiting massive public torrent sites that generate millions of trackable visits, you’ve got smaller, invite-only communities that share higher-quality content with far fewer people. User validation, lower web traffic, still the same amount of piracy, just a far better organisation.
Geographic Variations
The US accounts for around 9.9% of global music piracy traffic. When you think that this is the most mature streaming market in the world, with the highest Spotify and Apple Music adoption rates, and Americans are still responsible for nearly 10% of global music piracy. That’s a stark reality. That suggests this is not a developing market problem, but rather, a fundamental issue with the streaming model itself.
Piracy in the UK is hitting 26% despite having excellent legal options. British consumers have access to every major streaming platform, reasonable prices, fast internet, and strong legal frameworks. Yet, more than one in four people are still pirating music. The problem isn’t availability or infrastructure; it’s clearly value perception and platform frustration.
Brazil’s enforcement focus on stream-ripping makes perfect sense when you see the local data. Traditional torrenting never took off as much there, but stream-ripping exploded because it works well on mobile devices, which people could afford. And, it doesn’t require understanding complex BitTorrent setups and protocols. So, quite cleverly, Operation 404 targeted the specific piracy methods that were actually popular, rather than fighting yesterday’s war.
The economic factors vary by territory , too. In developed markets, it seems to be more about convenience and platform frustration. In developing markets, it’s still largely about cost and availability. But even within developed markets, you’re seeing economic pressure driving piracy decisions as subscription costs continue to pile up.
Method Evolution
A lot of analysis in this area often misses that downloading dominates over streaming piracy. That suggests a psychological shift back toward (physical?) ownership rather than just access. Stream-ripping is the primary piracy pathway now. It’s replaced torrenting as the go-to method because it reflects everything the consumer desires in their experiences, it’s faster, easier, safer, often higher quality and more reliable. P2P hasn’t disappeared entirely , though. It’s evolved into smaller, sophisticated communities. The public torrent sites that generated massive traffic are mostly dead (kinda). But invite-only trackers with strict rules and high-quality content are positively thriving. They remain invisible to modern traffic analysis because they’re deliberately staying under the radar, small, exclusive and niche.
This method of evolution reflects changing user expectations. People simply want instant gratification (stream-ripping wins). Mobile compatibility (apps beat websites). Social integration (messaging platforms beat isolated downloads). Quality assurance (curated sources beat random torrents).
The cross-platform expectation is huge, too. Some piracy tools are delivering better user experiences than legal platforms in this regard. Which, in 2025 should be a serious point of concern for the modern music industry.
What we’re seeing is piracy maturing alongside legal services. It’s not the chaotic, virus-filled landscape of the early 2000s. Private communities guard heavily against such things. Modern piracy tools often have better interfaces, more reliable downloads, and fewer security risks than the legal alternatives had twenty years ago.
Forward Analysis: The Tipping Points Ahead
Economic Pressure Points
In my estimation, we are heading towards a subscription sustainability crisis , and many people can feel it coming. The average household is already at $69+ month for streaming services, Gen Z/Millenials is juggling five different subscriptions, and inflation is going up and up. Wages have stagnated. There’s got to be a breaking point somewhere. Price sensitivity thresholds vary wildly by demographic , as well. Boomers with steady incomes might grumble about paying £15/month for streaming, but they’ll keep paying it. Gen Z living paycheck to paycheck? They’ll drop subscriptions in a heartbeat when rent goes up or student loan payments kick in and seek other means.
Here’s what’s scary: if we hit a proper economic recession , and the word on the street is that it is definitely on the way, music subscriptions are going to be among the first things people cancel. They’re not essential like Netflix (which people use for hours daily) or your phone service. Music feels more optional, dare I say disposable, in 2025, especially when free alternatives exist. During the 2008 recession, people didn’t stop listening to music; they just found cheaper ways to get it. And, the psychological tipping point might be closer than platforms think. When your total streaming bill hits £100+ a month across all services, people start doing the math differently.
Bundling fatigue is also real , too. Spotify adding audiobooks, Apple bundling everything together, Amazon throwing music into Prime, people are getting tired of paying for stuff they don’t want just to get the stuff they do want. At some point, the backlash against this forced bundling is going to be massive.
Technology Trajectory
The legal outcomes of the AI music generation cases are probably going to reshape everything. If Suno and Udio win their cases, or even just survive them, we’re looking at a world where anyone can generate unlimited “Taylor Swift-style” music for free. That’s not traditional piracy, it’s something entirely new that could make streaming subscriptions feel obsolete. But if the labels win big and get injunctions against AI training on copyrighted material, it might actually help the streaming industry. Legitimate AI music generation could become a premium feature that platforms offer to subscribers. “Generate personalised tracks based on your listening history” or, whatever. Turn the threat into a competitive advantage somehow.
Italy’s real-time blocking enhanced enforcement capabilities system is just the beginning of the corporate backlash as well. We’re probably heading toward AI-powered content recognition that can identify and block pirated material faster than humans can possibly reupload it. The question is whether enforcement tech will stay ahead of piracy innovation.
The next generation of ripping/blocking arms race is going to be mental. Stream-ripping works now because it exploits how streaming protocols deliver audio to legitimate users. But platforms could implement client-side encryption, hardware-level DRM, or streaming protocols that make extraction practically impossible. Of course, hackers will find workarounds, they always have, then platforms will counter those, and the cycle will continue.
Decentralised piracy networks are probably coming in the future too. Blockchain-based file sharing, mesh networks, and AI-powered content distribution. Stuff that’s much harder for governments to shut down because there’s no central server to target.
Industry Strategic Choices
What is clear from all of this is that the pricing strategies in an inflationary environment are going to make or break platforms. Keep raising prices and push more people toward piracy, or hold prices steady and squeeze profit margins. Feature bundling versus simplified tiers could be a strategic choice. Spotify’s audiobook experiment was a disaster because it forced complexity on users who wanted simplicity. The industry needs to decide whether it wants to be like cable TV (expensive bundles of stuff you don’t want) or more like Netflix (simple, easy-to-use UX, predictable pricing).
Exclusive content strategies need a rethink, too. When Taylor Swift releases exclusively on one platform, it drives piracy more than subscriptions. Fans don’t switch platforms; they just grab the music illegally and stay where they are. Universal availability might generate more total revenue than the creation of artificial scarcity.
Direct artist relationships are also going to become more and more important. Platforms that help artists build sustainable fan connections create stickier relationships than just being a music jukebox. Bandcamp figured this out years ago, and they NEVER get brought into these debates, EVER.
The international coordination question is also huge. Do platforms try to create one global service with consistent pricing and features, or do they adapt to local markets? The geo-blocking and regional pricing differences that drive piracy might be necessary evils, but at the end of the day, they’re still driving piracy.
Here’s the thing, though , the industry keeps fighting piracy like it’s 2005. Blocking websites, suing individual users, and trying to make examples of people. But modern piracy is more distributed, more social, and more integrated into how people actually use the technology. The old playbook isn’t going to work against new problems.
The smart money is probably on platforms that make legal access so convenient, reliable, and fairly priced that most people don’t bother with the alternatives. Because at the end of the day, most people aren’t ideologically opposed to paying for music; they just want a good deal and a good experience. Customers will ignore a lot of things for ease of use, a good UX and convenience.
Conclusion: Beyond the Piracy Cycle
The Sustainability Question
Let’s be real here . And, I’m not going to sit on the fence with this . The current market trajectory is broken for everyone involved. Artists aren’t making money from DSPs. Platforms are trying to compete on exclusive content and features nobody asked for. And, consumers are getting bled dry with subscription creep. Meanwhile, piracy is adapting faster than the legal ecosystem can respond. The industry keeps applying tactical plasters (band-aids) to structural problems. Blocking more websites, raising prices to cover licensing costs, and adding features to justify higher tiers. None of this actually addresses why people are turning to piracy in the first place. Structural solutions mean rethinking the entire model.
Maybe unlimited access to everything for £10/month was never sustainable. Maybe forcing geographic restrictions on the global internet was always going to create problems. Maybe bundling unwanted features with essential services was bound to backfire eventually.
The psychological contract between platforms and users is fundamentally broken. People expected that paying for streaming would mean reliable, convenient access to music. But platform disputes, licensing changes, and countless feature modifications have taught users that nothing is actually guaranteed.
Success Factors for Industry Recovery
A rebalancing of the price-value equation doesn’t necessarily mean cutting prices. It means making the value more obvious and consistent. Tidal’s £10.99 all-inclusive model works because it’s simple and users know exactly what they’re getting. Spotify’s audiobook confusion failed because people felt like they were paying more for stuff they didn’t want and didn’t ask for.
Availability and reliability improvements are probably more important than adding new features. Stop removing songs from playlists due to licensing disputes. Stop geo-blocking content in markets where you’re actively trying to grow subscriptions. Stop breaking user libraries when you change audio formats or tier structures. User experience innovation should focus on reducing friction , not adding complexity. The best piracy tools succeed because they’re really simple: copy a URL, get a file. Legal platforms could learn from that instead of constantly adding features that make the experience more complicated.
The ownership psychology isn’t going away, so maybe embrace it instead of fighting it. Let people download songs for offline use that actually stay available and downloaded. Create export tools so users don’t feel trapped. Give people some sense of control over their music libraries instead of treating everything like a rental that can be revoked at any time.
Direct artist-to-fan relationships also need far better platform support. The most piracy-resistant content is stuff where fans feel personally connected to the artist. Platforms that help build those relationships create the sticky value that modern artists need in the modern music industry.
The 2026 Outlook
Scenario 1: Continued Growth. If the economic pressures keep building and platforms keep raising prices, whilst delivering inconsistent UX, we could see piracy levels return to the mid-2000s heyday. AI music generation could accelerate this by providing “good enough” alternatives to paid subscriptions for more casual listeners.
Scenario 2: Stabilisation. If platforms get smarter about pricing and user experiences, whilst enforcement gets more effective at disrupting the easiest of piracy methods, we might see things level out. This requires both carrot and stick approaches to work simultaneously with each other.
The piracy cycle may well keep repeating itself because the industry keeps making the same mistakes. It’s treating the symptoms instead of causes, prioritising short-term revenue over long-term user relationships. And, assuming technical solutions can fix economic and psychological adaptations.
Breaking this cycle means admitting something awkward. People’s choices actually make perfect sense when you look at what options they have. Legal music services cost way too much money, crash right when you need them most, and annoy users with confusing apps that require tons of clicks just to play one song. While illegal websites let you download music instantly for free, with interfaces so simple that anyone can figure them out in under a minute. People will always pick the easiest option.
Companies should stop trying so hard to make piracy more difficult and start fixing the basic reasons why people choose the illegal stuff in the first place. The reward system that currently punishes people for doing the right thing by charging them high prices for bad experiences, while giving rule-breakers better services for free.
Here’s some good news, though. Most people actually want to support the artists they love. They just want fair prices that don’t force them to choose between buying music and buying lunch. Streaming apps should actually work when you hit play, and websites that are simple enough that finding your favourite song doesn’t feel like solving a maths problem created by people who dislike music fans.
Give people those three things consistently. Reasonable prices, reliable service, and super easy apps.Then? Piracy goes back to being what it used to be: something only computer nerds do instead of the obvious choice for normal people who just want to listen to songs without dealing with the corporate nonsense designed by people who’ve probably never even used their own apps.
The solution isn’t building bigger walls. It’s making the front door more appealing than climbing over the fence.
Top comments (0)